Monday 14 April 2014

Voting in 2014... Do you consider your future?

So the Local and European Elections 2014 are nearing and a lot of people seem to be siding with the “no nonsense” vote for UKIP. It is good that people are waking up and realizing that this country needs reform on a monumental scale but before anybody takes the plunge and puts their tick next to any candidates has anybody really researched any party and what they stand for?

I think by this point everyone knows that Labour and Conservative are two cheeks of the same ass with multiple assholes in between ready to shit on all of us, Lib Dem are the catalyst in the shitting on all of us... only lubricating the tainted sphincter walls of the two cheeks. So who does that leave then? Just UKIP?

No, there is still one quiet contender in all of this and a very concerned quiet contender they are. The Green Party have been around for some time now and usually get tarnished with a “tree hugger” brush, although there is some truth in that why be ashamed? We all live on a very unstable planet as it is and there doesn't seem to be much effort to try and aid the recovery. At the moment under Tories we are seeing an increase in the unconventional Fracking process as to make Britain “self sufficient” for gas. What they fail to tell you is the process uses more energy than it creates, poisons water supplies, weakens the bedrock (sinkholes appearing), pollutes the air and the end product has a tenfold higher radon count than in the gas supplied to your home today. If that isn't bad enough then the Tories are trying to remove wind farms because they are “eye sores”... I would rather my view obstructed than my water poisoned.

Now surely UKIP wouldn’t allow this sort of barbaric/counter productive set of events to continue, would they?

Wrong – They have, will and do. UKIP campaigned and won against the building of the world’s second largest offshore wind farm off the coast of Devon. This huge project was to be marked a huge push forward for the UK becoming energy self sufficient by green means. UKIP also plan for a push in the Fracking fiasco, promoting the same rhetoric suicidal message as the Tories by saying “it will make Britain Gas self sufficient”. All this is playing really nicely in their eyes as the Ukraine/Russia gas supplies are on unstable terms at present and threatening Europe with gas shortages... Promotion through fear (not to repeat any history...).

The Green Party have been campaigning for renewable energy solutions, actual long term solutions that protect the environment and will be sustainable far into the future. They propose a ban  on the Fracking companies and their dangerous methods of shale gas extraction, thus protecting water and air supplies and not forgetting less poison filled lorries on our already over used and damaged highways.

I have left out the immigration issue on this blog purposely as that is an issue that affects people differently dependent on what area you live in. But what does include us all is this planet and the ground we stand upon, without this vital lifeline we are all in serious trouble...

So before you vote this year please read into what you are voting for. Do you want a party that will carry on more nonsense corporate sponsored destruction for private profit or should we get the lands we live on in order, not for ourselves but for generations to come?

Basically; would you like to show your children/grand children the amazing spectacles of nature or try and describe how it used to be and how it all went because of the greed of men?!

“Why didn’t you try and stop them Granddad?”

“I was busy reading the likes of The Mirror and watching the BBC and not actually looking around at what was really going on...”

Don’t be brainwashed, think for yourselves and think for the future. Protect your future; protect your children’s future.

Friday 7 March 2014

Ukraine and the International Money Mafia...

What has happened to a world that truly believes that military force and flexing of such a muscle would ever help “relieve tensions?”. Oh times are stressful at the minute with all this austerity and fucking of the disabled but I can't think a tank driving down my street would help soothe me. So why would the USS Truxton in the Black Sea help ease any tension over Crimea? It won't, just like facing a peaceful protest with riot gear does not calm anything, only incites something it is meant to be “relieving”... Violence.

So why would the US do this? Also, why would the EU and the likes of David Cameron want anything to do with this? It seems idiotic to meet Russia with such a blatant flexing of such a said muscle. This all comes down to money.

Russia can station up to 25,000 troops in the region of Crimea, I won't go all the way into the history, Russian Prince Grigory Potemkin founded port city of Sevastopol in 1783 and there has been a Russian Naval presence in the region ever since. But when the people of Crimea ask for the Russians to help and they do... Who is anybody to question that or try and impose sanctions? Especially with all the unrest over the new founded self appointed government, which all of which is going to be subjected to a voting process in the near future, the people of Crimea have a right to feel a little uneasy until voting begins after the levels of violence seen in Kiev by all sides.

So how does this all lead to money? Still haven't explained that part have I. Well if you are aware of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and what that actually does then you needn't read on. The International Money Mafia helps spread that global debt around, look at what joining the EU did to Greece, now they want out of the EU! Globalisation is being achieved through debt, get a country into debt by lending them vast amounts of money and then they have to pay back with interest. Why do you see George (Gideon) Osborne waving a cheque book at the Ukraine, he wants them indebted to the west so that when repayments fail another agreement can be met, something like fracking for shale gas and taking natural resources out of that country, stripping any and every asset possible and making money and profits on it that only goes into private pockets. So basically you end up with the Ukraine in a environmental, political and financial mess, not to mention at the knees of the US and EU for survival. Stockholm Syndrome will have set in by then thus globalisation has the Ukraine netted and netted well.

It is all a ruse, a show if you will, just like Iraq's WMDs. How the likes of John Kerry can say this breaches International Law after such a blatant flaunting of such laws by invading Iraq is just beyond me. Some people may call the US the World Police, I would call them the World Bully.

You will not be hearing this side of the story on any of your news channels but you will see the trends within the economic/financial press. It is always good to keep an eye on where the markets for the energy industries are moving as this is a closer representation of how news events are unfolding, for example there has been a lot of interest in the oil under Venezuela since all the unrest over there.

How long can this suicidal ruling of the world carry on? How long can it happen under the farce of Democracy?

My video blog:

Tuesday 25 February 2014

The black gold and cost of it...

I start this blog with some confusion, money. Now don’t get me wrong I understand money is the way many people sustain and regulate their lives, generally consumed by it and the need to have more of it. In the most basic description it is just paper with some fancy looking print and holograms upon it of which man generally associates as a valuable asset.

I could understand it having “value” if it was regulated by being attached to a precious metal as it once used to be but no longer. The US dollar is now controlled by future oil exploration and a forecast of what oil can be extracted from the earth to support the dollar, so basically it is based on something that is in the ground that can’t be seen but certainly is what rules the world. Future oil exploration is becoming difficult in the traditional sense of acquiring oil as the reserves throughout the sea beds are not only becoming more scarce but with the growing debt that consumes the US and the threat of oil running out has seen times changing behind political closed doors.

Over the last 20 years the desperation for extracting the black gold has been one that generally requires a lot of political corruption of nations and failing that military intervention, if we cannot corrupt, we shall conquer.

This sort of mentality that adopts use of the military to extract a resource out of the earth is somewhat barbaric as in every war there are casualties. Now to you or I that is a tragic loss of life that could have been avoided if the politics had been more, well political... Mutual agreements on oil extraction and sale of the oil surely could be met. However that isn’t the stance that is taken when it comes to the old black gold because human lives can just be expendable with this quest, from soldiers to civilians and even environmental damage can be wrote off as a cost of doing business. There it is again, money... These pieces of paper, fancy pieces of paper can dictate whether a nation remains peaceful or war torn. Whether a child grows up in a loving family home or has to watch their family burn because of some other nation’s greed and lack of human emotion.

And after all that war and the oil has been taken what happens to this “national debt”? Does it reduce slightly because of the billions of dollars the oil has created? No, the tax payer pays for the troops to go and “liberate” this oil, the oil is extracted and sold back to the tax payer at a highly increased cost and the profits flow back up stream not caring how much destruction that has been left in the aftermath of this crusade. A thought has to be generated for all the people of these oil hungry nations that cannot afford the basic heating needs to survive the cold months; it kind of seems pointless that a nation is stripped of a natural resource to support another which cannot support its own poorest people.


What is the point? Have we as a species not evolved enough to stop wallowing in this fakery? If the money has begun to overrule the basic instincts of natural law (knowing right and wrong) on international levels then when is it going to stop?

We the people are the real commodity, the fruits of our labours pay the way for these atrocities to happen. The government is supposed to look after the people and respect people’s views but this has been distorted through time teaching people that we need these individuals in power to lead us. If we are ever required to be lead in a direction should it be one of this nature?